This article is an update on commercial and recreational
landings of halfbeak species and fishing effort, as well as a
review of biological characteristics and a preliminary assessment
of the fishery.
Download the Stock
Assessment (PDF 696 KB)
To view this PDF file, you will need
Adobe Reader.
To download Adobe Reader, visit http://get.adobe.com/reader/
A review of Florida's
halfbeak bait fishery,
halfbeak biology, and a preliminary stock assessment
Behzad Mahmoudi and Richard S. McBride
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Florida Marine Research Institute
St. Petersburg, FL
June 21, 2002
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In this report, we provide an update on commercial and
recreational landings of halfbeak species and fishing effort,
review their biological characteristics, and present a preliminary
assessment of the south Florida halfbeak fishery.
Three species of halfbeaks (Hemiramphidae) constitute a small
but valuable baitfish fishery in south Florida. Commercial fishers
harvest halfbeaks to sell as bait for pelagic and benthic
gamefishes (e.g., billfishes and groupers). Recreational charter
boat captains and private sport anglers also catch their own bait.
Commercial landings were highest during winter and lowest during
summer. Annual halfbeak commercial landings had been relatively
stable (median=1.2 million lb) even though fishing effort declined
during 1986-2000. Our analysis show that the catch rate in the
commercial fishery has increased in recent years in association
with an increase in the number of larger boats with larger holding
capacities and the expansion of the fishery to new fishing grounds.
This in turn has resulted in increasing harvests rates from
750-1,000 lbs per day to 1,000-1,250 lbs per day. The estimated
annual recreational halfbeak landing was relatively small and
varied between 2,924 and 38,690 lbs during 1982/83-2000/01.
Ballyhoo and balao are short-lived and their populations are
subject to high natural mortality and large recruitment
fluctuations. The size structure of both species changes rapidly
with respect to season. They initially recruit into the fishery in
June as age-0 fish and at sizes as small as 100 mm FL. These
young-of-the-year are fully recruited by October. Maximum observed
ages were 4 years for ballyhoo and 2 for balao. Ages 0 and 1
dominate the commercial catches. Spawning occurs in waters less
than 10 m deep and spawning is greatest during March-July. The
sizes at 50% maturity were calculated at 160 mm FL for balao and
198 mm FL for ballyhoo. Maximum size observed is 313 mm FL for
ballyhoo and 283 mm FL for balao.
For this stock assessment, we chose methods such as a modified
De Lury and surplus production that use fisheries landings and
effort data, to generate estimates of population size and fishing
mortality rates. Diagnostic measurements indicated that models fits
of the observed commercial and recreational catch data were
satisfactory. The mortality estimates derived from these models fit
in the range of independent mortality values available in the
literature. The fishing mortality estimates (0.83-1.2 per year)
from the De Lury method were in the range of the estimated natural
mortality rates (0.75-1.15 per year) which indicates the fishery is
operating at or above the MSY level (fully exploited). In addition,
the results from the surplus production model show that the total F
has generally been at or above the F MSY through most of
the 1990s, and this may have kept the biomass below the B
MSY level in recent years.
This preliminary assessment indicates that the recent expansion
in fishing effort and potential for future increase of fishing
effort may be a cause for concern and some level of management is
necessary. Given the extent of the recruitment variability and the
market demand for halfbeaks, the current F could exceed the
FMSY level even further and reduce the population
biomass to a lower level.
For other information:
Stock assessments for finfish and invertebrate
Ballyhoo and Balao species
account
Prior to July 1, 2004, the Fish and Wildlife Research
Institute was known as the Florida Marine Research Institute. The
institute name has not been changed in historical articles and
articles that directly reference work done by the Florida Marine
Research Institute.