FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
Time:
8:30 a.m.
Dates:
June 7-8, 2006
Place: West Palm
Beach Marriott
1001 Okeechobee Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
(561)833-1234
THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
All persons who so
desire, shall be given an opportunity to speak at a Commission workshop
or meeting within the guidelines established by the Commission. In
order to ensure the public’s opportunity to be heard and the orderly
conduct of the meeting, the Chairman reserves the right to establish a
time for adjournment of the workshop or meeting, to limit the time for
speakers, and to limit the time allotted for specific agenda items.
Pursuant to the
provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring
special accommodations to participate in this meeting is asked to advise
the agency at least five calendar days before the meeting by contacting
Cindy Hoffman at (850)488-6411. If hearing or speech impaired, please
contact the agency by calling (850)488-9542.
Agenda Items listed
under headings other than “Rules” may be moved by the Chairman to
different days of the meeting to accommodate scheduling problems.
If any person
decides to challenge any decision with respect to any matter considered
at the above meeting, he will need a record of the proceedings. For
this purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes testimony and evidence upon
which the challenge is to be based.
For information on
lodging and restaurants within the area you may call the Palm Beaches
Chamber of Commerce at (561)833-3711 or the Chamber’s website at
www.palmbeaches.org visit
www.VisitFlorida.com.
***Documents are in PDF
format, and you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader 7 to see them. You can
get Adobe Acrobat FREE by following
this link.
Viewers can
convert the pdf document to html through Adobe..***
>8:30
a.m., Wednesday, June 7
1. Meeting
Opening
A.
Call to Order
B. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
C.
Special Presentations and Recognitions
(1) Presentation of FWC Prosecutor of the Year Award to Ted Booras
of Palm Beach County.
(2) Recognition of Hunter Safety Instructor of the Year
(3) Introduction of local Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
staff.
2. Adoption
of Agenda
A.
Review and Approval of April 5-6, 2006 Commission Meeting Minutes
B. Approval of Consent Agenda (Attached)
C. Approval of Agenda
3. Executive
Director’s Report
4. Items
Requiring Action
A.
Rules
Tosohatchee Wildlife Management Area (WMA)—The following two rules are
needed to transfer the lead management authority for the Tosohatchee WMA
from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). NOTE: Should
authorization to transfer the lead management authority to the FWC not
occur prior to the June Commission meeting, the Commission may
approve the rules to become effective contingent upon transfer of
authority to the FWC.
(1) 68A-15.065, Specific Regulations for Wildlife Management
Areas-Northeast Region—The proposed rule would allow tent camping at
designated campsites during periods closed to hunting and would allow
public access on the area from 8 AM to sunset during periods closed to
hunting, unless camping at designated campsites. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(2) 68A-9.007, Fees—The proposed rule change would establish FWC
short-term use permits and fees for the Tosohatchee WMA to provide for a
management authority transition from DEP to FWC. These fees are the
same as those presently charged by DEP. The proposed public access fees
would be as follows: $3 per vehicle for a daily-use permit for all
outdoor recreational activities (including camping) other than hunting;
$1 for a daily-use permit for bicyclists and pedestrians; and $50 for a
daily-use permit for groups of 25 or more people. The proposed rule
would further establish that a daily-use permit would not be required
for persons participating in Commission-sponsored meetings or
activities; a daily-use permit would not be required for persons using
the Florida Trail for recreational hiking; a daily-use permit would not
be required for persons exempt from management area permit requirements
by Section 372.562, F.S.; and a daily-use permit would not be required
for the spouse or dependent children of persons in possession of a
management area permit while traveling in the same vehicle or in the
company of the permit holder.
(Background
Report-4/25/06)
(3) Uniform Procedure Rules
(Background
Report-4/26/06)
a. 68-1.001, Uniform Rules of Procedure;
Due Process Procedures; Subject Matter Index; Official Reporter—The
proposed rules would incorporate by reference the existing Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Due Process Procedures, which were
adopted by the Commission at its inception in 1999, into the
Commission’s procedural rule; the proposed rule would also transfer
applicable procedural rule language from Chapter 68A-2 to Chapter 68, a
new chapter established for procedural rules applicable to the entire
agency. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
b. 68-1.004, Standards—The proposed rule
would establish standards for Commission rulemaking relating to fishing
and hunting. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
c. 68A-2.004, 68A-2.005, 68A-2.009,
68A-2.013; Organizational Rules of the Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission—This proposed rule would repeal obsolete and unnecessary
organizational rules relating to the Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission (GFC) and will repeal two procedural rules the language of
which is being transferred to Chapter 68-1. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
d. 68B-1, Organizational and Procedures
Rules of the Marine Fisheries Commission—The proposed rule would repeal
the entire rule section 68B-1 which is obsolete and unnecessary
organizational and procedural rules of the Marine Fisheries Commission. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(4) 68C-22.015, Charlotte County (and part of DeSoto County) Zones,
Placida Harbor Area—The proposed rule would modify the manatee
protection zones in the Placida Harbor area of Charlotte County to
provide an additional 25 MPH channel for access to Little Gasparilla
Island. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
B.
Issues
The FWC imperiled
species listing process is driven by Florida-specific data and clear
standards consisting of measurable biological criteria peer reviewed by
panels of experts, agreed upon by FWC’s Commissioners, and strengthened
by species-specific management plans that are tailored to the unique
conditions and needs of each species. The imperiled species list
classifications identify those species facing the greatest risk of
extinction, they do not dictate the level of protection a species
receives. The status change for any species will occur only after a
species management plan is developed, professionally and publicly
reviewed, and accepted by the FWC’s Commissioners.
The FWC imperiled
species listing process is described in Florida Administrative Code Rule
68A-27.0012, Procedures for Listing, Delisting and Reclassifying
Endangered, Threatened and Species of Special Concern. The process
consists of Phases 1 and 2. (Background
Report-4/25/06) (Background
Report-06/06/06)
Phase 1
establishes the process for receiving and reviewing petitions to list a
species or change the listing status of a species. A request for
information regarding the petitioned species is published. FWC staff
recommends to the Commission a panel of scientists to review the
petition and associated information using the Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red
List Criteria. The biological review panel summarizes information from
the petition, information obtained from the public, and other available
biological data on the status of the petitioned species into a
biological status report. The biological status report is reviewed by
at least three independent scientists not involved in the biological
review panel. The Commission reviews the final biological status
report, independent scientific reviews, and public comments in making a
final determination whether the listing action is warranted. If the
Commission determines the listing action is warranted they will
determine the appropriate listing category for the species and establish
a timeframe for completion of the species’ management plan.
Phase 2
involves a formal solicitation for management-related information and
development of a draft management plan for the species. Final
Commission action includes formal action on the listing status and
approval of the management plan and any associated rules required to
implement the management plan.
The following four
agenda items constitute the Phase 1 recommendations for petitions on the
bald eagle, Panama City crayfish, gopher tortoise, and manatee.
(1) Consideration of Phase 1 of the Listing Process for the Bald
Eagle—Consideration of the bald eagle final biological status report,
biological recommendations from the panel of scientific experts, and
public testimony regarding biological status, to determine if listing
action is warranted. If listing action is warranted, the Commission
will specify the appropriate listing category and direct staff to
initiate Phase 2 of the listing process which includes development of
the management plan. The recommended management plan due date is
September 2007. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(2) Consideration of Phase 1 of the listing process for the Panama City
Crayfish—Consideration of the Panama City crayfish final biological
status report, biological recommendations from the panel of scientific
experts, and public testimony regarding biological status, to determine
if listing action is warranted. If listing action is warranted, the
Commission will specify the appropriate listing category and direct
staff to initiate Phase 2 of the listing process which includes
development of the management plan. The recommended management plan due
date is June 2007. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(3) Consideration of Phase 1 of the Listing Process for the Gopher
Tortoise—Consideration of the gopher tortoise final biological status
report, biological recommendations from the panel of scientific experts,
and public testimony regarding biological status, to determine if
listing action is warranted. If listing action is warranted, the
Commission will specify the appropriate listing category and direct
staff to initiate Phase 2 of the listing process which includes
development of the management plan. The recommended management plan due
date is June 2007. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(4) Consideration of Phase 1 of the Listing Process for the
Manatee—Consideration of the manatee final biological status report,
biological recommendations from the panel of scientific experts, and
public testimony regarding biological status, to determine if listing
action is warranted. If listing action is warranted, the Commission
will specify the appropriate listing category and direct staff to
initiate Phase 2 of the listing process which includes development of
the management plan. The recommended management plan due date is
February 2007. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(5) Proposed Duval County Manatee Protection Rules—Review and
discussion of recommended changes that would conform state manatee
protection zones with existing federal manatee protection zones in that
portion of the St. Johns River between the Fuller Warren Bridge and
Reddie Point. (Background
Report Update-5/08/06)
(Background
Report-4/25/06)
(6) Manatee Safe Haven Report—Review and discussion of a report
addressing the need for new manatee safe havens in Port Sutton
(Hillsborough County), Salt Springs and Silver Glen Springs (Marion
County), Welaka Springs (Putnam County), portions of Big Mud and Little
Mud creeks (St. Lucie County), and the Munyon Island area (Palm Beach
County).(Background
Report-4/25/06)
(7) Review and consideration of delegating to the Executive Director
the authority to sign an order establishing the Babcock Ranch Preserve
following purchase of the property by the State of Florida. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
5.
Public
Comment on Items Not on the Agenda
6.
Commission Exchange
7.
Recess
Wednesday Portion of Meeting
>8:30
a.m., Thursday, June 8, Reconvene
8. Items
Requiring Action
A.
Rules
(1) 68D-23, Uniform Waterway Markers in Florida Waters—The proposed
rule would correct and update statutory cross-references, improve
clarity and consistency of language and definitions, remove and/or
revise obsolete provisions and cross-references, reduce administrative
reporting requirements for local governments, and conform the rule to
changes made by the 2005 Legislature. (Background
Report-4/18/06) (Background
Report-4/20/06)(Background
Report Update-6/06/06)
(2) 68B-21.005, Size Limit on Snook—The proposed rule would adjust the
lengths (slot limit) of snook that may be legally harvested from 26 to
34 inches to 27 to 35 inches in order to compensate for any effects of
the new total length measurement method which will become effective on
July 1, 2006. (Background
Report Update-5/25/06)(Background
Report(Proposed Rule Language)-4/20/06) (Background
Report-5/22/06) (Background
Report Update-06/06/06)
(3) Emergency Rules 68B-45.004(9)(b), Regulation and Prohibition of
Certain Harvesting Gear and 68B-45.007, Blue Crab Limited Entry
Endorsement Program – The 2006 Legislature did not authorize fees and
penalties relating to the blue crab effort limitation program. Also,
legal issues have been raised as to FWC’s authority over fisheries
effort limitation programs. Therefore, this program should not be
implemented at this time.
(Background
Report-5/25/06)
The proposed emergency rules will continue the
moratorium on renewal or replacement of blue crab endorsements, except
those endorsements that were active during the 2005-2006 fiscal year,
and will make other changes necessitated by the delay in implementation
of the program. Without the emergency rule, the moratorium is scheduled
to end July 1, 2006 and current efforts to control the number of crab
traps and level of effort for this fishery could be significantly
jeopardized. Approval of this item will also authorize staff to
commence regular rulemaking to continue the moratorium until July 1,
2007 (or beyond) and to make other rule changes necessitated by the
delay of the program.
B. Issues
Federal Issues
C. Land
Acquisitions
Commission consideration of a temporary Delegation of Authority to the
Executive Director to approve land acquisitions, in consultation with
the Chairman, for the period June 8 through September 13, 2006 when
there are no scheduled Commission meetings. (Background
Report-4/20/06)
9.
Commissioners’ Areas of Emphasis
A.
Financial Business Plan
B. Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy—Wildlife
Legacy Initiative
(Background
Report-4/26/06)
C. Future of Hunting Update
(Background
Report-4/26/06)
D. Future of Saltwater Fisheries—Draft of Vision Document (Background
Report-4/25/06) (Background
Report-6/08/06)
E. Exotics—Exotic Pet Amnesty Day (Background
Report-4/26/06)
10. Staff Reports
Legislative Report
11. Public
Comment on Items Not on the Agenda
12.
Commission Exchange
13.
Commission Administrative Matters
The next
regular Commission meeting will be held September 13-15, 2006, at St.
Petersburg, commencing at 8:30 a.m. each day. This is a three-day
meeting to provide adequate time to discuss Legislative and Budget
issues.
14.
Adjournment
Consent
Agenda
June 2006
1. Approval of Proposed Aquatic Habitat Restoration/Enhancement Work
Plan for Fiscal Year 2006-07. (Background
Report-4/25/06)
(Background
Report-4/25/06)
2.
Review and consideration of early season migratory bird hunting
regulations for 2006-07. This includes hunting seasons and bag limits
for dove, snipe, woodcock, rail, gallinules, crow
(Background Report-4/25/06)